And what exactly do you want us, the whites, to say? You, the liberal SA ‘Human Rights’ Commission, says the whites have to engage in civilized, constructive communication, in the interest of transformation, with a group of beings that fails to act human, fails to treat us as the humans we are, fails to want to listen to the best free advice they’d ever get, and fails to realize that we, the whites, are NOT the racists they like to think (and shout from the rooftops) we are, and most definitely fail to acknowledge that THEY are the rotten apples in South Africa.
‘Racism’, as defined by the anc and the rest of the troop, is most defenitely alive and well in south africa, and thank GOD for that. What any person with a brain realize is that whites are not racists; we are, to use the jon qwelane argument, pro-white.
And, as the racist (in the TRUE meaning of the word) jon says, being pro white is not being anti black.
Thanks to the inability of the ruling anc to maintain order and civility amongst the millions of brainless drones who keep on voting them into power time and again, not helped by the anc’s active role in reducing the once efficient police force to nothing more than a national employment supplier to the same brainless masses, the whites are FORCED by the anc government to protect themselves by what appears to be the only way they can: by being overwhelmingly pro-white, or in the eyes of the grossly incompetent anc government, racist.
It is easy for you and I to see it, and hopefully within the next million years the blacks will start to see it too, but ‘racism’ as they see it, does not exist. It is a modern day political correct entertained concept, a concept that is based on instinctive reactions throughout nature, a concept who, thanks to the PC liberals, suddenly has been labeled as being bad, when in all reality it is a natural process whereby each species, in this case humans (whites) of the same origin has the desire to be amongst those like themselves. The problem in south africa is that blacks, who throughout their entire existence fails to act in the predictable way of human beings, are composed of a dangerous mixture of potions.
These include the desire to have everything that the humans have, the desire not to get it by the same means the humans use to get it (by working for it), the complete lack of moral guards that will prevent the blacks of stealing from the humans, and the complete lack of a conscience, which would have enabled them to feel remorse for their barbaric behavior, compounded by a race of humans (the whites) who tolerate the actions of the blacks unconditionally (as a whole), even going so far as to try and put the blame for the failure of the black race on other (white) humans, instead of reacting to the antics of the blacks in the only way the blacks really understand, which has been proven to be the only effective way, that being violent retribution.
It is my advice to every human out there (that means white people, excluding the PC liberal crap) to continue doing what has been done since the inception of the modern description of own-interest actions (the blacks call it ‘racism’):
continue to see it for what it is: the hooting and hollering of sub-humans from the top branches in a hopeless effort to make their enemy, the white person, look like the cause of their problems. It is classic tactics used by blacks to divert the attention away from the REAL problem: themselves.
‘We must talk to each other’
11/03/2008 20:09 - (SA)
Johannesburg - Racism is alive and well in South Africa, said the SA Human Rights Commission (HRC) on Tuesday.
“I don’t think South Africans talk about racism as we should… and the lessons we can learn from the last two or three weeks is that racism is alive and well in South Africa,” said HRC chairperson Jody Kollapen at the Johannesburg Press Club.
Kollapen spoke about South Africa’s progress and its challenges in the human-rights arena in light of recent events including a racist (racist?? WTF? I though the HRC would have been able to see the video for what it really was: a big old joke, with WILLING participants) video which emerged at the Free State university, the Skielik shooting and the barring of white journalists from the Forum of Black Journalists (FBJ) (the black journalists do not think this was racist, just pro-black. So, what the fuck is the difference?).
Kollapen said: “My own view was that the reconciliation process was at the expense of transformation.
“I also argued that and I continue to argue that, in terms of transformation, hardly anything was asked of white South Africans,” he said. (besides their wives to rape, their daughters to rape, their husbands to kill, their possessions to steal, their loved ones to murder, I guess he’s right; the whites did not give anything…).
“And white South Africa was not really given the opportunity to engage with what happened in the past.” (like what?)
Kollapen said South Africans, black and white, did not have a “common sense” of where they came from and when programmes advancing transformation were put in place, “people say, hold on, this goes against the very idea of reconciliation”. (how wrong you are, asswipe: the whites most definitely know where they came from: civilization, and where they are going: down the hole.)
He said the Truth and Reconciliation Commission focused “unduly” on the “excesses” of apartheid; it never really began a conversation between ordinary South Africans. (that is because it was guided by that dress wearing denialist freak desmond i-hate-whites tutu, the loudest howler monkey in the tree).
Continue to be divided
“What the TRC didn’t do was to begin a conversation between you and me… we never spoke, we never spoke about what apartheid meant for you and what it meant for me,” he told journalists. (oh please, spare me. Besides, the blacks have fucked relations up so much by now that it is beyond repair)
“On the one hand is the sense that we continue to be divided by our blackness and our whiteness. (wrong again. we are not divided by color, we are divided by our actions)
“I think the challenge is to transcend the sense that we have over our blackness and our whiteness… (good luck with that one)
“I think it requires hard work and I think it requires ordinary people to speak to each other (and me thinks nothing less that DIVINE INTERVENTION will enable this bullshit).”
Referring to the FBJ, Kollapen said the constitutional right to freedom of association should not be used as a disguise for racism. (why then, when I want to exercise this right, am I being made out as a racist, ha? that’s right, bozo: no answer for that one…)
The FBJ had provoked vigorous debate on the desirability of racially exclusive organisations.
Kollapen said the objective of an organisation would not necessarily have to be reflected by its membership. (except if it is a white organization, cause then the anc wants to see population based demographic representation, of course, or it will be labeled as a racist colonial cesspit…)
The HRC was expected to release a report on it next week.
Focusing on human rights in its entirety, Kollapen said South Africa’s rapid transition to democracy posed a problem in cultivating a culture of human rights. (dude, you forgot to add the last part of the sentence: …cultivating a culture of human rights amongst blacks, because they completely fail to understand the concept of another person’s human rights, and not just their own.)
‘Massive gap’
“… you hardly had time to breathe when overnight you had a democratic government underpinned by a progressive constitution (correction: democratically elected government, which does not mean a democratically run country, as south africa is a REPUBLIC, not a DEMOCRACY, meaning once the government had been elected in a ‘democratic’ manner, they do not need the permission of the populace (in the forms of referendums) to do whatever the fuck they want for their entire term in parliament. Best example of this is floor crossing, and thank fuck it’s about to be scrapped) underpinned by a progressive constitution...(which is perfectly fine for a CIVILIZED population, but clearly should not be expected to bear any fruit on the entire african continent in the effort to control millions of mindless drones)… there was hardly time for South Africans to absorb all of this,” he said.
“I’m not saying that we should have set low standards, but I think what it demonstrates is that the standards set and the jurisprudence in place are quite far removed from the reality on the ground and the consciousness of people.” (because anything more than watching cows is rocket science to africans)
He said there was a “massive gap” and this posed a “significant threat” to democracy. (luckily we’re safe, as there IS NO democracy in south africa)
Kollapen said this gap was manifested in the many South Africans who opposed abortion or believed the death penalty should be enforced. (which proves the point that blacks will let anything slide if it’s done by a fellow black, especially if done to a white, and most definitely if what is done is bad)
Denis, one of our readers sent this in. 
%5B1%5D.JPG)
